Fig. 7
From: Sex differences in mouse infralimbic cortex projections to the nucleus accumbens shell
Optogenetic stimulation during reversal trials. A In females, there were significant differences in the number of optogenetic stimulation trains received during reversal trials between 10Â Hz versus 20Â Hz and 30Â Hz. B In males, increasing the optogenetic stimulation frequency did not increase the number of stimulations. C Increasing stimulation frequency in females resulted in differences in the mean amount of time optogenetic stimulation was received, again between 10Â Hz versus 20Â Hz and 30Â Hz. At 30Â Hz stimulation, females received significantly more optogenetic stimulation than did males. D In males, there were no significant differences in mean time optogenetic stimulation