Fig. 6

Spatial learning. No effect of gestational CIH on latency to target was observed in females, regardless of age (A). Age improved latency to target during day 2 of learning in males with no effect of age observed on other days (B). Learning index was not affected by gestational CIH or sex during puberty (C). Males had shorter learning index than females during young adulthood (D). Analyzed by Two-way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD multiple comparisons tests. ANOVA significance indicated by: * = sex; ** = age; Post-hoc significance indicated by: # = versus normoxic female, ## = versus normoxic male; ### = versus CIH female; p ≤ 0.05; P = Puberty; YA = Young Adult